Twitter is down (so what’s new?), so I guess that means that I’m going to have to blog my outrage to the news that a judge ordered YouTube to give its user data to Viacom. All this in the midst of the $1 billion lawsuit that forced Stephen Colbert off of the ‘Tube, made Google wish it had never thought of acquiring the video sharing service, sparked one of the major reasons for the recent writer’s strike, and now led into yet the latest infringement of internet privacy.

First off, what is Viacom’s problem? Why can’t they just do what the other major networks have done and partner up with YouTube! For Pete’s sake, I can already watch The Daily Show and The Colbert Report IN FULL on their own website with almost no ads, why are they making such a big deal over YouTube?

But what really makes no sense is why Viacom even needs to see the complete records of every single video ever watched on YouTube, complete with username, IP address, and time watched (which must be millions of pages long, I would imagine), along with copies of every video ever removed from YouTube. That’s not copyright infringement, that’s privacy infringement. It shouldn’t be any of Viacom’s business how many times I watch three guys sing about their missing legwarmers or a tomato and a cucumber sing about the difference between a monkey and an ape.

But while those examples may be somewhat humorous and intentionally revealing, internet privacy is quite serious and has affected lives. The article I linked to gave an example of someone who was sent to a concentration camp because Yahoo! was forced to give up information to the Chinese government.

The judge at this case dismissed Google’s concerns over privacy as “speculative.” Well, I may not be a lawyer, and I’m certainly not one to gamble, I’d be more than willing to speculate that this is going to set a very, very bad precedent for the privacy of the internet as we’ve come to know it. I do hope that someone rules this to be illegal, and if not, then there had better be some sort of internet outcry, because this is just wrong and immoral.

Tags: court, Google, judge, privacy, ruling, Viacom, Videos, YouTube

Well, it’s the morning of Steve’s annual Macworld Keynote, and this year, I seem strangely unenthusiastic about the whole thing. Perhaps it’s the fact that I’ve just been too preoccupied recently, or maybe because I think the name “MacBook Air” is the dumbest rumored idea that I’ve ever heard. However, fifty-three weeks ago, on the eve of the keynote, I posted some Stevenote Funnies for your pre-keynote enjoyment. I’ve got a few more for you this year.

Most of these videos, by the way, are from the All About Steve collection by rmoisescot, and I certainly don’t want to hog any credit for doing anything but turing this up in a YouTube search.

Boom!

Pixar (not that Steve has any conflict of interest…)

Woo!

The Best in the World (so why doesn’t the market share agree…)

Really Cool

Premature Specification

And finally, although it’s not necessarily a funny, here’s a look back at the intro of the Power Mac G4 Cube, a great idea that never made it for some reason.

Enjoy these videos, and hopefully the keynote! Me? I’ve got a very busy day at school today, so I’ll just be surprised when I get home.

Tags: funnies, Keynote, Macworld, Steve Jobs, Videos

The folks at Bill Me Later have started up their own viral web video campaign, called Operation Fruitcake. The goal of this video campaign is to find as many ways as possible to rid the world of the holiday scourge, known as fruitcake, that everyone likes to buy but no one likes to eat. One of their videos comes from Will It Blend?, as they blend up fruitcake along with everything else that you don’t need anymore thanks to Bill Me Later.

If you’re one of the anti-fruitcakers in the world, you might want to keep an eye on Operation Fruitcake this holiday season. I know that I’ll be keeping watch (and taking notes…).

Tags: Bill Me Later, fruitcake, funny, holidays, Videos, Will it Blend?, YouTube